Should Arbitrum approve the ArbOS 61 “Elara” upgrade?

The constitutional proposal would raise the Stylus code-size limit and permit a bounded adjustment of the minimum L2 base fee. A dynamic-pricing component was removed after feedback. Commons prepared this source-linked brief from the named primary source. It is not an official endorsement, a certified outcome, or a copy of participation on the source site.

The change people are here to shape

Compare technical benefits, risks and the final official governance outcome.

Who can actArbitrum DAO

People and groups affected

developersARB governance participantsapplicationsnetwork users

Add something only you know

What should Arbitrum DAO hear?

Choose a starting point. You can write before signing in; your draft stays on this device until you publish.

The public story starts with the first firsthand view.

If this affects you—or you know what a workable response needs—put that experience where others can build on it.

Campaign snapshot

Affected groups named

Source status

Upcoming

What happens next

Public input
People can add experience and improve the response.
Common ground
Shared ground, disagreement and options can be synthesized without erasing dissent.
Response or decision
The responsible organization can respond or open a governed decision.
Outcome watch
Implementation, correction, withdrawal or victory remains visible.

Public chronology

How this record changed

Reported

Jul 16, 2026, 3:56 PM

Source-linked starter brief imported from a verified primary source

Sources and verification